Okay, while I'm elated that President Obama won a second term in Office, clearly there are a whole bunch of people who have hurt feelings over the whole thing. But rather than handle their disappointment at how the election turned out like politically responsible adults, they're tantrumming and acting out the way a small child does when Mom says, "No, you cannot have candy bars and strawberry soda for breakfast."
I am pretty sure that when George W. Bush won the election back in 2000, a lot of Democrats were really upset. But mostly, it was due to the whole Florida/Jeb Bush/voting scandal thing. But after about a week and a recount that didn't come out the way that Al Gore wanted it to, they all swallowed hard and accepted that they would just have to come up with a better strategy and/or candidate for 2004.
And they didn't. And George W. Bush won again. But you know what, that's okay. Because while he and Congress were busy deregulating banks and making corporations people and continuing to fight two wars that we didn't really have the money to fight, the Democrats got their stuff together and came up with a few really good candidates and eventually, Senator Barack Obama won that candidacy. And then he won the election.
He was voted into office in 2008 because the majority of Americans (voting Americans) believed him to be
the better candidate. Because see? We Democrats managed to survive eight years of George W. Bush. And while he left a big ole economic, financial, mess behind, we were still here. Ready to stand up, put on the gloves and pick up shovels and dig ourselves out of the crap. And in 2012, having made good on a lot of, but not yet all of, his promises, Barack Obama won a second term in office. He won it. FAIR AND SQUARE.
And maybe it wasn't because President Obama is the best man for the job. However, the majority of voting Americans decided that he WAS the best man out of the candidates they had to choose from.
Here is where people need to start taking a little responsibility. I believe that Al Gore was NOT the right candidate for President in 2000. In fact, I voted for George W. Bush in that election. I didn't know that much about him then. I did know enough about Al Gore to believe that he was the wrong man for the job.
Since former President Bush had planes scrambled to bomb the shit out of Afghanistan less than 15 minutes after the bombing of the World Trade Center, far too short a time to determine who was actually responsible for the horrific act, I decided to get to know the candidates a little better before the next election time. You know pay attention to the who's who of Washington, because Dude! People were DYING....and a lot of them.
I researched who all was running in the primaries...well, most of them. The only one who was worth half a tinker's damn on the Republican side was Alan Keyes and frankly his tax code ideas started out as a cool new approach....until he started the talk of one or two generations of reparations via tax exemption for African-American of slave heritage. Also, he began using big words like "socialist experiment" to refer to income taxes. I have issues with elected officials referring to issues with which they don't agree as "socialist."
Most of the time, they're not capable of defining the word socialism. The rest of the Republican candidates looked more like contestants for a possible reality game show that could be called "REAL EGOMANIACS of NARCISSIST CITY." Come on! Rudolph Giuliani? He was on Saturday Night Live at least four times, not to mention five or six other television shows and several movies.
Romney, Gingrich, McCain, Paul, and Huckabee all fighting each other for the spot light and none making much sense on any issues, in my opinion. I have no idea what Fred Thompson had upstairs to offer in politics. Frankly, Ronald Reagan should remain our one and only Actor-turned-President. Besides, I don't think anyone could watch a State-of-the-Union Address given by Fred Thompson without looking around for Jerry Orbach to read someone his rights. So what was my point again?
Oh, yeah. The Republican party didn't have any GOOD candidates groomed for the win in 2008. Pretty much 2012 was a re-run of the 2008 primaries. But once that whole Tea-Party thing got a little momentum (and an assload of money from the Koch Bros,) things took a weird turn and I re-registered as a Democrat.
Here is what I'm trying to say: If you don't like the outcome, then do something POSITIVE about it. Like get involved in politics yourself. You don't have to run for President if you don't want to. But get involved. Find out who the movers and the shakers are within the party you affiliate yourself with. Stop swallowing headlines spewed out by ANY mainstream news. Find papers from all extremes and from the middle of the road. You want balanced reporting? You're NEVER going to find it unless you balance it yourself.
Fact check what is said in the Huffington Post (very biased- liberal), on FOX News (ultra-biased Republican), Christian Science Monitor (slightly biased Republican), the New York Times (fair/even most times), the Baltimore Sun (fairly even), Chicago-Sun Times (slightly biased Republican), Milwaukee Journal (slightly biased Democrat)...or whatever source you get your news from. You can read the same news items in the Washington Times and in the Washington Post and get two entirely different slants from newspapers located within 5 miles of each other. Check the facts in everything.
But don't start acting like you cannot possibly survive a mere four years until the next election, crying foul and racist remarks or threatening to secede from the nation or trying to run your husband over with a Jeep because he didn't vote (as though his vote would have mattered since this happened in Arizona which went to Romney ANYWAY! DO YOU PEOPLE EVEN KNOW HOW TO READ???)
Grow up, America. Sometimes you win and sometimes you lose. Get over it. Get up. Come up with a worthwhile candidate who doesn't hide money or change his stance on issues multiple times in the course of a year and get him elected FAIR AND SQUARE. That's what responsible adults do.
I am pretty sure that when George W. Bush won the election back in 2000, a lot of Democrats were really upset. But mostly, it was due to the whole Florida/Jeb Bush/voting scandal thing. But after about a week and a recount that didn't come out the way that Al Gore wanted it to, they all swallowed hard and accepted that they would just have to come up with a better strategy and/or candidate for 2004.
And they didn't. And George W. Bush won again. But you know what, that's okay. Because while he and Congress were busy deregulating banks and making corporations people and continuing to fight two wars that we didn't really have the money to fight, the Democrats got their stuff together and came up with a few really good candidates and eventually, Senator Barack Obama won that candidacy. And then he won the election.
He was voted into office in 2008 because the majority of Americans (voting Americans) believed him to be
the better candidate. Because see? We Democrats managed to survive eight years of George W. Bush. And while he left a big ole economic, financial, mess behind, we were still here. Ready to stand up, put on the gloves and pick up shovels and dig ourselves out of the crap. And in 2012, having made good on a lot of, but not yet all of, his promises, Barack Obama won a second term in office. He won it. FAIR AND SQUARE.
And maybe it wasn't because President Obama is the best man for the job. However, the majority of voting Americans decided that he WAS the best man out of the candidates they had to choose from.
Here is where people need to start taking a little responsibility. I believe that Al Gore was NOT the right candidate for President in 2000. In fact, I voted for George W. Bush in that election. I didn't know that much about him then. I did know enough about Al Gore to believe that he was the wrong man for the job.
Since former President Bush had planes scrambled to bomb the shit out of Afghanistan less than 15 minutes after the bombing of the World Trade Center, far too short a time to determine who was actually responsible for the horrific act, I decided to get to know the candidates a little better before the next election time. You know pay attention to the who's who of Washington, because Dude! People were DYING....and a lot of them.
I researched who all was running in the primaries...well, most of them. The only one who was worth half a tinker's damn on the Republican side was Alan Keyes and frankly his tax code ideas started out as a cool new approach....until he started the talk of one or two generations of reparations via tax exemption for African-American of slave heritage. Also, he began using big words like "socialist experiment" to refer to income taxes. I have issues with elected officials referring to issues with which they don't agree as "socialist."
Most of the time, they're not capable of defining the word socialism. The rest of the Republican candidates looked more like contestants for a possible reality game show that could be called "REAL EGOMANIACS of NARCISSIST CITY." Come on! Rudolph Giuliani? He was on Saturday Night Live at least four times, not to mention five or six other television shows and several movies.
Romney, Gingrich, McCain, Paul, and Huckabee all fighting each other for the spot light and none making much sense on any issues, in my opinion. I have no idea what Fred Thompson had upstairs to offer in politics. Frankly, Ronald Reagan should remain our one and only Actor-turned-President. Besides, I don't think anyone could watch a State-of-the-Union Address given by Fred Thompson without looking around for Jerry Orbach to read someone his rights. So what was my point again?
Oh, yeah. The Republican party didn't have any GOOD candidates groomed for the win in 2008. Pretty much 2012 was a re-run of the 2008 primaries. But once that whole Tea-Party thing got a little momentum (and an assload of money from the Koch Bros,) things took a weird turn and I re-registered as a Democrat.
Here is what I'm trying to say: If you don't like the outcome, then do something POSITIVE about it. Like get involved in politics yourself. You don't have to run for President if you don't want to. But get involved. Find out who the movers and the shakers are within the party you affiliate yourself with. Stop swallowing headlines spewed out by ANY mainstream news. Find papers from all extremes and from the middle of the road. You want balanced reporting? You're NEVER going to find it unless you balance it yourself.
Fact check what is said in the Huffington Post (very biased- liberal), on FOX News (ultra-biased Republican), Christian Science Monitor (slightly biased Republican), the New York Times (fair/even most times), the Baltimore Sun (fairly even), Chicago-Sun Times (slightly biased Republican), Milwaukee Journal (slightly biased Democrat)...or whatever source you get your news from. You can read the same news items in the Washington Times and in the Washington Post and get two entirely different slants from newspapers located within 5 miles of each other. Check the facts in everything.
But don't start acting like you cannot possibly survive a mere four years until the next election, crying foul and racist remarks or threatening to secede from the nation or trying to run your husband over with a Jeep because he didn't vote (as though his vote would have mattered since this happened in Arizona which went to Romney ANYWAY! DO YOU PEOPLE EVEN KNOW HOW TO READ???)
Grow up, America. Sometimes you win and sometimes you lose. Get over it. Get up. Come up with a worthwhile candidate who doesn't hide money or change his stance on issues multiple times in the course of a year and get him elected FAIR AND SQUARE. That's what responsible adults do.
Couldn't agree more, and I'm a Republician!
ReplyDelete